Rarest Sun Signs? Does it matter?

Since astrologers in droves decided that 3 months is an appropriate time to proclaim proficiency–vetting in these spaces isn’t really a necessity.

A video popped up proclaiming that the 2 Saturn Ruled signs are the least in population. And that there isn’t much information on Capricorns by Capricorns because of this.

Ok, sure, I can get on board with this mildly, though different sources state different things on birth rate months–a sun sign does not an astrologer make.

I think that more of what this is, is that the studied astrologer doesn’t constantly talk about their chart. Wouldn’t the viewer get bored if every post gave the astrologers natal chart as credentials.

I’m more curious if this hot take would be around Saturn placements–though this isn’t where we look in the chart to see if astrology is a defined practice or even profession. We look to Mercury and the 9th house. Secondly, possibly, Jupiter and the 3rd house. In my experience as well as study–the condition of the planet, esp Mercury and what is articulated through the houses.

Defining everything through the lens of sun signs is to a detriment. I think that it is the result of erasure. The result of capital interest and depth psychology. Its entertainment and further washes the study and credibility of Astrology.

To circle back yes there are astrologers with a Cap Sun, or even with a stellium–I am one.

Astrology hot takes are like cold readings–they have a time and place to capitalize on the desperate and insecure.